SUNITA SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS — WRIA/6582/2020
Case under Mandamus/act Not Mentioned Section NG. Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010826152020
Filing Number
WRIC/129307/2020
Filing Date
05-Aug-2020
Registration No
WRIA/6582/2020
Registration Date
22-Aug-2020
Judge
Manju Rani Chauhan
Coram
Manju Rani Chauhan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO PRIMARY EDUCATION (TEACHING STAFF) (SINGLE BENCH) ( 15500 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNITA SINGH
Adv. ARUN KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
Adv. ,PRANESH DUTT TRIPATHI 1123
-
2.DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER MAU
-
3.PRINCIPAL BALIKA POORV MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYA
-
4.LEKHA ADHIKARI MAU
-
5.BALIKA POORV MADHYAMIK VIDYALAY MAU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Manju Rani ChauhanView PDF
The Allahabad High Court dismissed Sunita Singh's writ petition as infructuous on March 18, 2026. The petition, pending since 2020, was dismissed due to non-appearance of petitioner's counsel and failure to mark that the cause of action still survived, despite a specific notice warning old cases would be dismissed if not properly marked. The petitioner retains liberty to file a recall/restoration application if cause of action survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Feb-2026
—
Manju Rani Chauhan
-
04-Feb-2026
—
Manju Rani Chauhan
-
09-Jan-2026
—
Prakash Padia
-
05-Dec-2025
—
Prakash Padia
-
18-Nov-2025
—
Prakash Padia
-
27-Oct-2025
—
Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)
-
24-Sep-2025
—
Manju Rani Chauhan
-
02-Sep-2025
—
Manju Rani Chauhan
-
13-Aug-2025
—
Manju Rani Chauhan
-
24-Jul-2025
—
Manju Rani Chauhan
-
05-Jun-2025
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
19-May-2025
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
01-May-2025
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
08-Apr-2025
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
04-Mar-2025
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
06-Feb-2025
—
Prakash Padia
-
16-Jan-2025
—
Prakash Padia
-
03-Dec-2024
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
13-Nov-2024
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
22-Oct-2024
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
26-Sep-2024
—
Prakash Padia
-
12-Sep-2024
—
Prakash Padia
-
31-Aug-2024
—
Prakash Padia
-
14-Aug-2024
—
Prakash Padia
-
01-Aug-2024
—
Prakash Padia
-
16-Jul-2024
—
Kshitij Shailendra
-
07-Jun-2024
—
Piyush Agrawal
-
31-May-2024
—
Piyush Agrawal
-
24-May-2024
—
Piyush Agrawal
-
17-May-2024
—
Piyush Agrawal
-
16-Apr-2024
Piyush AgrawalView PDF
-
16-Apr-2024
—
Piyush Agrawal
-
15-Mar-2024
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
27-Feb-2024
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
20-Feb-2024
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
12-Feb-2024
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
31-Jan-2024
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
16-Jan-2024
—
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
04-Jan-2024
For Admission
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
-
21-Sep-2023
For Admission
Manjive Shukla
-
13-Jul-2023
For Admission
Manjive Shukla
-
10-Feb-2023
For Admission
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
03-Feb-2023
For Admission
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
28-Jan-2023
For Admission
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
-
20-Jan-2023
For Admission
Rajeev Singh
-
16-Jan-2023
For Admission
Rajeev Singh
-
19-Nov-2022
For Admission
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
14-Nov-2022
For Admission
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
04-Nov-2022
For Admission
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
21-Oct-2022
For Admission
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
14-Oct-2022
For Admission
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
30-Sep-2022
For Admission
Ashutosh Srivastava
-
26-Apr-2022
For Admission
Rajiv Joshi
-
28-Jan-2021
For Admission
Yashwant Varma
-
15-Dec-2020
Yashwant VarmaView PDF
-
15-Dec-2020
For Order
Prakash Padia
-
02-Nov-2020
Prakash PadiaView PDF
-
02-Nov-2020
For Order
Vivek Agarwal
-
02-Nov-2020
For Order
Vivek Agarwal
-
31-Aug-2020
Vivek AgarwalView PDF
-
31-Aug-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2020
Case filed
Registration No. WRIA/6582/2020
The Allahabad High Court dismissed Sunita Singh's writ petition as infructuous on March 18, 2026. The petition, pending since 2020, was dismissed due to non-appearance of petitioner's counsel and failure to mark that the cause of action still survived, despite a specific notice warning old cases would be dismissed if not properly marked. The petitioner retains liberty to file a recall/restoration application if cause of action survives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts