AMAN vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/1815/2026
Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v). Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC010815182026
Filing Number
CRLA/
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRLA/1815/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Appeal under provision of of 14 (A) (2) of SC/ST against Bail orders allowing or rejecting the bail applications by the SC /ST Special Court ( Exclusive Special Courts) (Minor Bail category) ( 17 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMAN
Adv. JITENDRA SINGH,SUDARSHAN SINGH,SUDARSHAN SINGH, ,SUDARSHAN SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SHAKEEL HUSSAIN
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF
Summary of CRLA 1815/2026 The Allahabad High Court allowed the criminal appeal and granted bail to appellant Aman, setting aside the Special Judge's bail rejection order dated 27.01.2026. The Court found the lower court's decision illegal, noting that the injuries were not life-threatening and the appellant had no criminal history despite being in custody since 27.11.2025. Bail was granted on personal bond, two sureties, and conditions including non-tampering with evidence and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
08-Apr-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
01-Apr-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
25-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/1815/2026
Summary of CRLA 1815/2026 The Allahabad High Court allowed the criminal appeal and granted bail to appellant Aman, setting aside the Special Judge's bail rejection order dated 27.01.2026. The Court found the lower court's decision illegal, noting that the injuries were not life-threatening and the appellant had no criminal history despite being in custody since 27.11.2025. Bail was granted on personal bond, two sureties, and conditions including non-tampering with evidence and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts