SHIVPOOJAN vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/6056/2026
Case under Asiatic Society Act Section 3,62-3. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010814422026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA528/6056/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVPOOJAN
Adv. SAROJ KUMAR DUBEY,VINEET KUMAR YADAV,VINEET KUMAR YADAV, ,VINEET KUMAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.LEKHPAL NEHA SRIVASTAVA
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
18-May-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
06-May-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
23-Apr-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
16-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Vivek Kumar SinghView PDF
Case Summary: NA528/6056/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad admitted Shivpoojan's petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings under the U.P. Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, arising from an alleged land encroachment charge. The court issued notice to the State, stayed further proceedings against the applicant pending final disposal, and directed the State to file a counter-affidavit within six weeks. The matter was adjourned for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/6056/2026
Case Summary: NA528/6056/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad admitted Shivpoojan's petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings under the U.P. Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, arising from an alleged land encroachment charge. The court issued notice to the State, stayed further proceedings against the applicant pending final disposal, and directed the State to file a counter-affidavit within six weeks. The matter was adjourned for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts