VEER PRATAP SINGH @ VEER BAHADUR SINGH @ BIRU YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., AJAY KUMAR YADAV — CRLA/1644/2026
Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(1)(da),72-3(1)(da). Disposed: -- on 28th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010796772026
Filing Number
CRLA/
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRLA/1644/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Judge
Abdul Shahid
Coram
Abdul Shahid
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Appeal u/s 14A(1) against any order (Including orders of cancellation of bail), not being an interlocutory order, passed by Exclusive Special Court or Special Court of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Amendment Act, 20 ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Decision Date
28-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VEER PRATAP SINGH @ VEER BAHADUR SINGH @ BIRU YADAV
Adv. PHOOL SINGH YADAV,VAIBHAV YADAV,VAIBHAV YADAV, ,VAIBHAV YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., AJAY KUMAR YADAV
-
2.CHHEDI LAL
Adv. AJAY KUMAR YADAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
—
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
-
18-Mar-2026
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
This is a preliminary hearing order, not a final judgment. The High Court of Allahabad admitted respondent's counsel Ajay Kumar Yadav's appearance on March 18, 2026, and adjourned the criminal appeal to March 27, 2026 for substantive hearing after the respondent's advocate requested time to prepare the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/1644/2026
This is a preliminary hearing order, not a final judgment. The High Court of Allahabad admitted respondent's counsel Ajay Kumar Yadav's appearance on March 18, 2026, and adjourned the criminal appeal to March 27, 2026 for substantive hearing after the respondent's advocate requested time to prepare the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts