GYANESH CHATURVEDI vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA — NA528/6068/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010793052026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA528/6068/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GYANESH CHATURVEDI
Adv. HIMANSHU SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA
-
2.SMT. DIVYA CHATURVEDI
Adv. LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA
Case History
-
26-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-May-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
19-May-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
11-May-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
04-May-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
27-Apr-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
20-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF
Case Summary: NA528/6068/2026 Gyanesh Chaturvedi filed a Section 528 BNSS petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings (FIR dated 19.08.2019 for alleged offences under IPC Sections 354, 504, 506) arising from a July 2019 incident in Mathura. The court found the matter prima facie requires consideration. The court issued notice to the private opposite party, stayed further proceedings against the applicant, and adjourned the case for eight weeks to allow counter and rejoinder affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/6068/2026
Case Summary: NA528/6068/2026 Gyanesh Chaturvedi filed a Section 528 BNSS petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings (FIR dated 19.08.2019 for alleged offences under IPC Sections 354, 504, 506) arising from a July 2019 incident in Mathura. The court found the matter prima facie requires consideration. The court issued notice to the private opposite party, stayed further proceedings against the applicant, and adjourned the case for eight weeks to allow counter and rejoinder affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts