UMESH SHARMA vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NABAIL/1679/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 420,43-420. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

Next hearing 25-May-2026

CNR: UPHC010790162026

Filing Number

NABAIL/

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

NABAIL/1679/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

ABAIL MINOR ( 64 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 420,43-420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESH SHARMA

    Adv. AKHILESH RANJAN PANDEY,MALTI SHARMA,MALTI SHARMA, ,MALTI SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.S.L. KUSHWAHA

Case History

  1. 25-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  3. 18-May-2026

    —

    Jai Prakash Tiwari

  4. 11-May-2026

    —

    Avnish Saxena

  5. 04-May-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  6. 23-Apr-2026

    Rajiv Lochan ShuklaView PDF

    In this anticipatory bail application (BNSS 482), the High Court of Allahabad adjourned the matter to May 4, 2026, directing the applicant's counsel to file the case ordersheet with updated trial status. The previously granted interim order was extended until the next hearing date. The matter was not considered tied up to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 23-Apr-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  8. 16-Apr-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  9. 08-Apr-2026

    —

    Rajiv Lochan Shukla

  10. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 19-Feb-2026

    Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NABAIL/1679/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In this anticipatory bail application (BNSS 482), the High Court of Allahabad adjourned the matter to May 4, 2026, directing the applicant's counsel to file the case ordersheet with updated trial status. The previously granted interim order was extended until the next hearing date. The matter was not considered tied up to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case