JAY SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A. — BAIL/8285/2026

Case under Asian Refractories Limited (Acquisition of Undertakings) Act Section 11,61-11. Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010785362026

Filing Number

BAIL/

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

BAIL/8285/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Judge

Krishan Pahal

Coram

Krishan Pahal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (minor) ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Asian Refractories Limited (Acquisition of Undertakings) Act Section 11,61-11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAY SINGH

    Adv. DILNAWAZ AHMAD KHAN,CHARAN SINGH,CHARAN SINGH, ,CHARAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Krishan PahalView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Jay Singh, a vehicle driver arrested for transporting cattle under sections of the BNS and U.P. Cow Slaughter Act. The court found the case suitable for bail, noting that no animal was actually slaughtered, the applicant had no criminal history, and the State could not dispute the applicant's innocence claims. Singh was released on personal bond and two sureties with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    —

    Ashutosh Srivastava

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BAIL/8285/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Jay Singh, a vehicle driver arrested for transporting cattle under sections of the BNS and U.P. Cow Slaughter Act. The court found the case suitable for bail, noting that no animal was actually slaughtered, the applicant had no criminal history, and the State could not dispute the applicant's innocence claims. Singh was released on personal bond and two sureties with conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case