MAYA DEVI vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C. — WRIC/8280/2026

Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

Next hearing 14-Jul-2026

CNR: UPHC010770882026

Filing Number

WRIC/

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

WRIC/8280/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ANY OTHER WRIT PETITION NOT MENTIONED IN THE CODE BOOK ( 390000 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAYA DEVI

    Adv. TAHMINA BEGUM,MOHD. MONIS,MOHD. MONIS, ,MOHD. MONIS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.POLICE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE PRAYAGRAJ

  3. 3.JHARKHAND SPECIAL AUXILIARY POLICE-2

Case History

  1. 14-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 14-Jul-2026

    For Admission

    Garima Prashad , Saral Srivastava

  3. 13-May-2026

    Garima Prashad,saral SrivastavaView PDF

    In WRIC 8280/2026 at Allahabad High Court, the petition by Maya Devi against the State of U.P. and two others was listed for hearing on May 13, 2026. The case was adjourned in ordinary course as the petitioner's counsel was absent during the hearing before Justices Saral Srivastava and Garima Prashad. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-May-2026

    —

    Garima Prashad , Saral Srivastava

  5. 06-May-2026

    —

    Garima Prashad , Saral Srivastava

  6. 29-Apr-2026

    As Fresh

    Garima Prashad , Saral Srivastava

  7. 28-Mar-2026

    Garima Prashad,saral SrivastavaView PDF

  8. 28-Mar-2026

    —

    Atul Sreedharan , Siddharth Nandan

  9. 20-Mar-2026

    —

    Atul Sreedharan , Siddharth Nandan

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIC/8280/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In WRIC 8280/2026 at Allahabad High Court, the petition by Maya Devi against the State of U.P. and two others was listed for hearing on May 13, 2026. The case was adjourned in ordinary course as the petitioner's counsel was absent during the hearing before Justices Saral Srivastava and Garima Prashad. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case