RACHIT PATHAK AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,PRAGYA PANDEY,MEHUL KHARE — NA528/6036/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 448,43-448. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC010765322026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA528/6036/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RACHIT PATHAK AND ANOTHER
Adv. PADMAKER PANDEY,RAKESH KUMAR SHUKLA,RAKESH KUMAR SHUKLA, ,RAKESH KUMAR SHUKLA
-
2.AMAN SHUKLA @ MAHESHWARI PRASAD
Adv. RAKESH KUMAR SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,PRAGYA PANDEY,MEHUL KHARE
-
2.MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA
Adv. MEHUL KHARE PRAGYA PANDEY
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-May-2026
—
Sanjiv Kumar
-
04-May-2026
—
Sanjiv Kumar
-
27-Apr-2026
—
Sanjiv Kumar
-
27-Apr-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
20-Apr-2026
—
Sanjiv Kumar
-
10-Apr-2026
—
Samit Gopal
-
03-Apr-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
19-Feb-2026
Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF
Case Summary: NA528/6036/2026 The High Court at Allahabad admitted a petition by Rachit Pathak and another seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from an FIR filed over a civil land dispute regarding property demarcation. The court found the matter prima facie worthy of consideration and granted interim relief by staying further proceedings against the applicants. The case is adjourned for eight weeks, with the State and opposite party required to file counter-affidavits within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/6036/2026
Case Summary: NA528/6036/2026 The High Court at Allahabad admitted a petition by Rachit Pathak and another seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from an FIR filed over a civil land dispute regarding property demarcation. The court found the matter prima facie worthy of consideration and granted interim relief by staying further proceedings against the applicants. The case is adjourned for eight weeks, with the State and opposite party required to file counter-affidavits within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts