ARVIND vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,RAM RAJ PANDEY,SHUBHAM PANDEY — NA528/6118/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 366,43-366. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Next hearing 06-May-2026

CNR: UPHC010758382026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

NA528/6118/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 366,43-366

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARVIND

    Adv. DHARMENDRA KUMAR MISHRA,ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA,ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA, ,RAVI SHUKLA,ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,RAM RAJ PANDEY,SHUBHAM PANDEY

  2. 2.VICTIM / INFORMANT

    Adv. SHUBHAM PANDEY RAM RAJ PANDEY

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    —

    Vivek Kumar Singh

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    —

    Vivek Kumar Singh

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Avnish SaxenaView PDF

    Case Summary: NA528/6118/2026 The High Court at Allahabad partially granted Arvind's petition challenging the cognizance order dated 12.11.2025 in a POCSO Act case. The Court quashed the non-bailable warrant issued against the accused, subject to his appearance before the trial court within 15 days. However, the cognizance order itself was suspended but not quashed, and the trial may proceed. The case is adjourned to 16.04.2026 for further hearing, with the State directed to file a counter affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/6118/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NA528/6118/2026 The High Court at Allahabad partially granted Arvind's petition challenging the cognizance order dated 12.11.2025 in a POCSO Act case. The Court quashed the non-bailable warrant issued against the accused, subject to his appearance before the trial court within 15 days. However, the cognizance order itself was suspended but not quashed, and the trial may proceed. The case is adjourned to 16.04.2026 for further hearing, with the State directed to file a counter affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case