ASHIF vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/1841/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 376-D,43-376-D. Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010755402026

Filing Number

CRLA/

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLA/1841/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Judge

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Coram

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Appeal under provision of of 14 (A) (2) of SC/ST against Bail orders allowing or rejecting the bail applications by the SC /ST Special Court ( Exclusive Special Courts) (major Bail category) ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 376-D,43-376-D
Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHIF

    Adv. KRISHNA PRATAP YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.VIRENDRA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court allowed Ashif's bail appeal under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, finding sufficient grounds for release after he had been imprisoned since June 2024. The court considered that the informant's statement didn't support the prosecution, the victim's testimony indicated her consent in traveling with a co-accused, the medical report contradicted prosecution claims, and a co-accused received bail on parity grounds. Ashif was granted bail with personal bond, two sureties, and strict conditions including cooperation with prosecution and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    —

    Shekhar Kumar Yadav

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/1841/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court allowed Ashif's bail appeal under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, finding sufficient grounds for release after he had been imprisoned since June 2024. The court considered that the informant's statement didn't support the prosecution, the victim's testimony indicated her consent in traveling with a co-accused, the medical report contradicted prosecution claims, and a co-accused received bail on parity grounds. Ashif was granted bail with personal bond, two sureties, and strict conditions including cooperation with prosecution and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case