VISHWANATH SHUKLA AND OTHERS K.K.DUBEY, ,DEVENDRA KUMAR MISHRA,S.K. PURWAR,QASI VAKAIL AHMAD vs BHAGWAN DASS — SAPL/1166/2001
Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC010745782001
Filing Number
SAPL/1166/2001
Filing Date
28-Aug-2001
Registration No
SAPL/1166/2001
Registration Date
28-Aug-2001
Judge
Jayant Banerji
Coram
Jayant Banerji
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SECOND APPEAL ( 300100 )
Sub-Category
Injunction ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Appeal
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHWANATH SHUKLA AND OTHERS K.K.DUBEY, ,DEVENDRA KUMAR MISHRA,S.K. PURWAR,QASI VAKAIL AHMAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHAGWAN DASS
Adv. ,GYANEDRA PRATAP SINGH 1123
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
—
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
23-Mar-2026
Dr. Y. K. SrivastavaView PDF
In Second Appeal No. 1166 of 2001 before the Allahabad High Court, the case of Vishwanath Shukla and Others v. Bhagwan Dass was heard on March 23, 2026. The court passed an order noting "Steps taken" and directed the "Office to proceed," indicating the case was adjourned for further proceedings rather than being decided on merits at that hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Feb-2026
—
Dr. Y. K. Srivastava
-
17-Oct-2025
—
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
-
29-May-2025
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
05-May-2025
—
Vipin Chandra Dixit
-
25-Sep-2024
—
Kshitij Shailendra
-
20-Dec-2023
For Order
Jayant Banerji
-
16-Oct-2023
For Order
Jayant Banerji
-
09-Aug-2023
For Order
Jayant Banerji
-
23-May-2023
For Order
Prakash Padia
-
03-Apr-2023
For Order
Prakash Padia
-
20-Mar-2023
For Order
Ajit Kumar
-
19-Dec-2022
For Order
Vivek Chaudhary
-
12-Dec-2022
For Order
Vivek Chaudhary
-
16-Mar-2020
For Order
Vivek Kumar Birla
-
30-Aug-2001
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Aug-2001
Case filed
Registration No. SAPL/1166/2001
In Second Appeal No. 1166 of 2001 before the Allahabad High Court, the case of Vishwanath Shukla and Others v. Bhagwan Dass was heard on March 23, 2026. The court passed an order noting "Steps taken" and directed the "Office to proceed," indicating the case was adjourned for further proceedings rather than being decided on merits at that hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts