ARSHAD @ QAZI MOHAMMAD ARSHAD vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/5629/2026
Case under Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act Section 5,4-5. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010744992026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
NA528/5629/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARSHAD @ QAZI MOHAMMAD ARSHAD
Adv. SHEIKH OBAIDULLAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SUB-INSPECTOR RITESH KUMAR SINGH
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
18-May-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
06-May-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
23-Apr-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
16-Apr-2026
For Order
Vivek Kumar Singh
-
18-Feb-2026
Vivek Kumar SinghView PDF
Case Summary: NA528/5629/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned; proceedings stayed pending further hearing. Arshad sought quashing of Criminal Case No. 199 of 2023 involving Arms Act violations, arguing he was implicated solely on co-accused Aftab Alam's confession without spot arrest and that sanction was never obtained from the District Magistrate. The High Court found the matter required consideration and issued notice to the opposite party. The court directed the State to file counter-affidavit within six weeks, followed by rejoinder within two weeks, and granted a stay on further proceedings against the applicant until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/5629/2026
Case Summary: NA528/5629/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned; proceedings stayed pending further hearing. Arshad sought quashing of Criminal Case No. 199 of 2023 involving Arms Act violations, arguing he was implicated solely on co-accused Aftab Alam's confession without spot arrest and that sanction was never obtained from the District Magistrate. The High Court found the matter required consideration and issued notice to the opposite party. The court directed the State to file counter-affidavit within six weeks, followed by rejoinder within two weeks, and granted a stay on further proceedings against the applicant until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts