AMJAD ALI vs STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,SHAKIL AHMAD — CRLRD/358/2026
Case under Advocates Act Section 156(3),10-156(3). Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010730112026
Filing Number
CRLRD/
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRLRD/358/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
REVISION ( 401300 )
Sub-Category
CRIMINAL REVISIONS AGAINST any matter in 156(3) Cr.P.C. ( 32 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMJAD ALI
Adv. ASHVNI MISHRA,SANDEEP KUMAR,SANDEEP KUMAR, ,SANDEEP KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,SHAKIL AHMAD
-
2.ASAD ALI
Adv. SHAKIL AHMAD
-
3.RAIS AHMAD
Adv. SHAKIL AHMAD
-
4.IMRAN ALI
Adv. SHAKIL AHMAD
-
5.MOHD. RIZWAN
Adv. SHAKIL AHMAD
-
6.JUNAID ALI
Adv. SHAKIL AHMAD
-
7.SMT. SHABNAM
Adv. SHAKIL AHMAD
-
8.AYAJ
Adv. SHAKIL AHMAD
-
9.INTEJAR
Adv. SHAKIL AHMAD
Case History
-
21-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-May-2026
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
24-Apr-2026
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
31-Mar-2026
—
Subhash Chandra Sharma
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Abdul ShahidView PDF
In Criminal Revision Defective No. 358 of 2026, petitioner Amjad Ali filed a revision with a delay condonation application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for a 550-day delay. The Allahabad High Court issued notice to opposite party no. 2 to file a counter-affidavit within three weeks, with rejoinder affidavit due within two weeks thereafter. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLRD/358/2026
In Criminal Revision Defective No. 358 of 2026, petitioner Amjad Ali filed a revision with a delay condonation application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for a 550-day delay. The Allahabad High Court issued notice to opposite party no. 2 to file a counter-affidavit within three weeks, with rejoinder affidavit due within two weeks thereafter. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts