JITENDRA SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,SHIVA KANT SRIVASTAVA — CRLA/1634/2026
Case under Advocates Act Section 216,10-216. Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010729372026
Filing Number
CRLA/
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
CRLA/1634/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Judge
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
Coram
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Appeal u/s 14A(1) against any order (Including orders of cancellation of bail), not being an interlocutory order, passed by Exclusive Special Court or Special Court of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Amendment Act, 20 ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JITENDRA SINGH
Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH,RAJRSHI GUPTA,RAJRSHI GUPTA, ,Sr. Advocate,RAJRSHI GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,SHIVA KANT SRIVASTAVA
-
2.HEMA KUMARI
Adv. SHIVA KANT SRIVASTAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
—
Devendra Singh-I , Salil Kumar Rai
-
18-Mar-2026
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 1634 of 2026 filed by Jitendra Singh as infructuous due to lapse of time. All parties, including the appellant's counsel, the State's representative, and the respondent's counsel, consented to the dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/1634/2026
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 1634 of 2026 filed by Jitendra Singh as infructuous due to lapse of time. All parties, including the appellant's counsel, the State's representative, and the respondent's counsel, consented to the dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts