SMT NEELAM YADAV vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., VIKAS KUMAR,RAMESH CHANDRA YADAV — CRLR/957/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 34,43-34. Disposed: -- on 16th February 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010717702026

Filing Number

CRLR/

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLR/957/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Judge

Abdul Shahid

Coram

Abdul Shahid

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISION ( 401300 )

Sub-Category

Against order issuing summons in case of any nature not provided elsewhere ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

16-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 34,43-34
Advocates Act Section 319,10-319

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT NEELAM YADAV

    Adv. AKHIL KRISHNA,JAGADISH PRASAD YADAV,JAGADISH PRASAD YADAV, ,JAGADISH PRASAD YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., VIKAS KUMAR,RAMESH CHANDRA YADAV

  2. 2.SUNIL SINGH

    Adv. RAMESH CHANDRA YADAV VIKAS KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Feb-2026

    —

    Abdul Shahid

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Abdul ShahidView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Smt. Neelam Yadav's criminal revision challenging her summoning as an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. in a murder case. The court found sufficient evidence on record from witness P.W.-1's testimony alleging her specific role in restraining the victim while her associate inflicted fatal knife wounds, establishing more than mere prima facie case required for summoning under the extraordinary power. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Abdul ShahidView PDF

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/957/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Smt. Neelam Yadav's criminal revision challenging her summoning as an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. in a murder case. The court found sufficient evidence on record from witness P.W.-1's testimony alleging her specific role in restraining the victim while her associate inflicted fatal knife wounds, establishing more than mere prima facie case required for summoning under the extraordinary power. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case