YOGESH SHARMA vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/5124/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 420,43-420. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

Next hearing 25-May-2026

CNR: UPHC010694462026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

NA528/5124/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. order summoning accused in a complaint case without filing revision ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 420,43-420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YOGESH SHARMA

    Adv. AKANCHA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SUNIL KUMAR

Case History

  1. 25-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    —

    Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

  3. 18-May-2026

    For Order

    Padam Narain Mishra

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Padam Narain MishraView PDF

    Yogesh Sharma filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1292 of 2025) against him for alleged cheating (Section 420 IPC), claiming he is wrongly named and received no payments. The High Court of Allahabad found the matter requires consideration, issued notice to the respondent, and granted interim protection by restraining coercive action against the applicant pending further hearings scheduled after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    —

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    —

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    —

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    —

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/5124/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Yogesh Sharma filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1292 of 2025) against him for alleged cheating (Section 420 IPC), claiming he is wrongly named and received no payments. The High Court of Allahabad found the matter requires consideration, issued notice to the respondent, and granted interim protection by restraining coercive action against the applicant pending further hearings scheduled after six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case