VISHAL SINGH vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/5481/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 420,43-420. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.

Next hearing 27-May-2026

CNR: UPHC010674112026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

NA528/5481/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 420,43-420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL SINGH

    Adv. ANAND PATI TIWARI,GYAN DEV TIWARI,GYAN DEV TIWARI, ,GYAN DEV TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.DIPTI AWASTHI

Case History

  1. 27-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-May-2026

    —

    Saurabh Srivastava

  3. 20-May-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad admitted Vishal Singh's petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Section 420 IPC) alleging he fraudulently booked a bus seat but boarded another bus. The court found prima facie grounds for consideration, noting lack of pre-summoning evidence and that the matter was suitable for consumer forum. The court stayed further proceedings against the applicant and directed parties to file counter and rejoinder affidavits within prescribed timelines, with case listed after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    —

    Prashant Bilgaiyan Registrar (J) (Criminal)

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    —

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/5481/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad admitted Vishal Singh's petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Section 420 IPC) alleging he fraudulently booked a bus seat but boarded another bus. The court found prima facie grounds for consideration, noting lack of pre-summoning evidence and that the matter was suitable for consumer forum. The court stayed further proceedings against the applicant and directed parties to file counter and rejoinder affidavits within prescribed timelines, with case listed after eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case