THE DIVISIONAL MANGER FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA vs THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER CENTRAL AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER PG ACT 1972 AND 3 OTHERS — WRIC/5866/2026
Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010673722026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
31-Jan-2026
Registration No
WRIC/5866/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
NOT COVERED UNDER AFORESAID HEADS ( 25900 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE DIVISIONAL MANGER FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
Adv. NISHANT MEHROTRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER CENTRAL AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER PG ACT 1972 AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. ,GAURAV SRIVASTAVA,ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,ANJU SRIVASTAVA,A.S.G.I. 1123
-
2.SHRI BABU NANDAN RAM
Adv. A.S.G.I. ANJU SRIVASTAVA ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA GAURAV SRIVASTAVA
-
3.APPEELATE AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT
Adv. A.S.G.I. ANJU SRIVASTAVA ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA GAURAV SRIVASTAVA
-
4.ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER
Adv. A.S.G.I. ANJU SRIVASTAVA ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA GAURAV SRIVASTAVA
Case History
-
04-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
27-Apr-2026
—
Arun Kumar
-
19-Feb-2026
Arun KumarView PDF
Summary: The High Court at Allahabad admitted the writ petition filed by Food Corporation of India challenging gratuity forfeiture orders dated 27.3.2023 and 31.12.2025. The court found the matter requires consideration and issued notice to the respondent employee. Pending hearing, the court granted interim relief staying coercive action, provided 50% of the deposited amount is released to the employee and remaining 50% invested in an interest-bearing bank account. Case adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/5866/2026
Summary: The High Court at Allahabad admitted the writ petition filed by Food Corporation of India challenging gratuity forfeiture orders dated 27.3.2023 and 31.12.2025. The court found the matter requires consideration and issued notice to the respondent employee. Pending hearing, the court granted interim relief staying coercive action, provided 50% of the deposited amount is released to the employee and remaining 50% invested in an interest-bearing bank account. Case adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts