ANURAG GUPTA vs STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,AJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA — NA528/5860/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010655032026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
30-Jan-2026
Registration No
NA528/5860/2026
Registration Date
07-Feb-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANURAG GUPTA
Adv. PRAMOD KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,AJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA
-
2.SUBASH CHANDRA GUPTA
Adv. AJAY KUMAR CHAURASIA
Case History
-
26-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-May-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
19-May-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
11-May-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
04-May-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
27-Apr-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
20-Apr-2026
—
Saurabh Srivastava
-
31-Mar-2026
For Order
Deepak Verma
-
25-Feb-2026
—
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Padam Narain MishraView PDF
Case Summary: NA528/5860/2026 Anurag Gupta filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Case Crime No. 02 of 2018) registered under IPC Sections 452, 506 at P.S. New Agra, Agra. He argued the FIR was false and filed to harass him, and that the parties involved had agreed to withdraw the case through a mutual consent divorce decree. The court found the matter prima facie requires consideration. The court adjourned the case for six weeks, issued notice to respondent no. 2, and imposed a stay on coercive action against the applicant pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/5860/2026
Case Summary: NA528/5860/2026 Anurag Gupta filed a petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings (Case Crime No. 02 of 2018) registered under IPC Sections 452, 506 at P.S. New Agra, Agra. He argued the FIR was false and filed to harass him, and that the parties involved had agreed to withdraw the case through a mutual consent divorce decree. The court found the matter prima facie requires consideration. The court adjourned the case for six weeks, issued notice to respondent no. 2, and imposed a stay on coercive action against the applicant pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts