ATUL PANDEY vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,SATYENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI,MADAN PAL SINGH VISEN — NA528/4878/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Next hearing 24-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC010651262026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

NA528/4878/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. order summoning accused in a complaint case without filing revision ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 08-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ATUL PANDEY

    Adv. AMAN SINGH VISEN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,SATYENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI,MADAN PAL SINGH VISEN

  2. 2.ABHISHEK PANDEY

    Adv. MADAN PAL SINGH VISEN SATYENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI

  3. 3.SANOOP PANDEY

    Adv. MADAN PAL SINGH VISEN SATYENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI

  4. 4.RAJESH PANDEY

    Adv. MADAN PAL SINGH VISEN SATYENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI

  5. 5.AJAY PANDEY

    Adv. MADAN PAL SINGH VISEN SATYENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    —

    Dr. Gautam Chowdhary

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    —

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    —

    Nand Prabha Shukla

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Nand Prabha ShuklaView PDF

    In this Section 528 BNSS application before the Allahabad High Court, petitioner Atul Pandey sought relief against the State of U.P. and four others. The court heard counsel for all parties and noted that the parties intended to settle the dispute through compromise. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing on March 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/4878/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In this Section 528 BNSS application before the Allahabad High Court, petitioner Atul Pandey sought relief against the State of U.P. and four others. The court heard counsel for all parties and noted that the parties intended to settle the dispute through compromise. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing on March 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case