LALA RAM vs STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — CRLP/2582/2026

Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Next hearing 22-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC010636682026

Filing Number

CRLP/

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRLP/2582/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

QUASHING OF FIR ( 150300 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal WRITS

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LALA RAM

    Adv. SANJAY KUMAR PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  3. 3.S.H.O. OF P.S. JASARATHPUR

  4. 4.DHARANA CHAUHAN, SUPPLY INSPECTOR, BLOCK JAITHARA, P.S. JASARATHPUR, TEHSIL ALIGANJ

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    —

    Tarun Saxena , J.J. Munir

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    —

    Lakshmi Kant Shukla , Rajeev Misra

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Lakshmi Kant Shukla,rajeev MisraView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP/2582/2026 Lala Ram, a fair price shop dealer, challenged an FIR lodged under Sections 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Allahabad High Court found the petitioner's legal arguments regarding the defective charging sections merit consideration and the State could not effectively counter them. The petition was adjourned for admission on 15.04.2026, with notices issued to respondents for counter-affidavits within six weeks. As an interim measure, the petitioner was granted protection from arrest in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/2582/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP/2582/2026 Lala Ram, a fair price shop dealer, challenged an FIR lodged under Sections 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The Allahabad High Court found the petitioner's legal arguments regarding the defective charging sections merit consideration and the State could not effectively counter them. The petition was adjourned for admission on 15.04.2026, with notices issued to respondents for counter-affidavits within six weeks. As an interim measure, the petitioner was granted protection from arrest in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case