GYAN SINGH ALIAS GYANU vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C. — WRIA/1734/2025

Disposed: -- on 16th February 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Feb-2025

CNR: UPHC010613292025

Filing Number

WRIA/

Filing Date

06-Feb-2025

Registration No

WRIA/1734/2025

Registration Date

07-Feb-2025

Judge

Vikas Budhwar

Coram

Vikas Budhwar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (SINGLE BENCH) ( 11500 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

16-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GYAN SINGH ALIAS GYANU

    Adv. DAYA SHANKAR SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.DEPUTY DIRECTOR RANIPUR TIGER RESERVE / DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER

  3. 3.PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR AND HEAD OF DEPARTMENT, ENVIRONMENT FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE DEPARTMEN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Feb-2026

    —

    Anish Kumar Gupta

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Anish Kumar GuptaView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel confirmed that the minimum pay scale order (without allowances) had already been granted. The court ordered that benefits granted shall continue until superannuation, subject to satisfactory performance, with termination possible only after due process and hearing if misconduct occurs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-Nov-2025

    —

    Vikas Budhwar

  5. 15-Nov-2025

    —

    Vikas Budhwar

  6. 11-Aug-2025

    —

    Prakash Padia

  7. 07-Mar-2025

    —

    Ajit Kumar

  8. 20-Feb-2025

    Ajit KumarView PDF

  9. 20-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 06-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIA/1734/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel confirmed that the minimum pay scale order (without allowances) had already been granted. The court ordered that benefits granted shall continue until superannuation, subject to satisfactory performance, with termination possible only after due process and hearing if misconduct occurs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case