AKASH KUMAR AND 4 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., KARTIKEY DUBEY, MAN MOHAN MISHRA — CRLA/1383/2026

Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v). Disposed: -- on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-Mar-2026

CNR: UPHC010607612026

Filing Number

CRLA/

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRLA/1383/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Judge

Abdul Shahid

Coram

Abdul Shahid

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Appeal u/s 14A(1) against any order (Including orders of cancellation of bail), not being an interlocutory order, passed by Exclusive Special Court or Special Court of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Amendment Act, 20 ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Actquaries Act Section 3(2)(v),72-3(2)(v)
Andhra State Act Section 511,43-511

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKASH KUMAR AND 4 OTHERS

    Adv. ATHARVA DIXIT,GAURANG DWIVEDI,GAURANG DWIVEDI, ,Sr. Advocate,GAURANG DWIVEDI

  2. 2.SATYAPAL PRAJAPATI

    Adv. GAURANG DWIVEDI Sr. Advocate

  3. 3.BALWANT UPADHYAYA

    Adv. GAURANG DWIVEDI Sr. Advocate

  4. 4.BAIKUNTH MISHRA

    Adv. GAURANG DWIVEDI Sr. Advocate

  5. 5.SATISH JAISWAL

    Adv. GAURANG DWIVEDI Sr. Advocate

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., KARTIKEY DUBEY, MAN MOHAN MISHRA

  2. 2.RAVI SHANKAR

    Adv. MAN MOHAN MISHRA KARTIKEY DUBEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    —

    Abdul Shahid

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Abdul ShahidView PDF

    The Allahabad High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by government officials (Akash Kumar and 4 others) against a summoning order, setting aside charges under IPC sections 451, 461, 511, 166, 426, 448, 506, and SC/ST Act provisions. The court found the complaint lacked credible evidence—the complainant produced no documentary ownership proof, photos, or satisfactory explanation for alleged demolished debris, while a District Magistrate's report confirmed the houses under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana remained intact with family members residing there. The court accepted the final investigation report and concluded the officials' actions constituted lawful discharge of official duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    —

    Abdul Shahid

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Abdul ShahidView PDF

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    —

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    —

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/1383/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Allahabad High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by government officials (Akash Kumar and 4 others) against a summoning order, setting aside charges under IPC sections 451, 461, 511, 166, 426, 448, 506, and SC/ST Act provisions. The court found the complaint lacked credible evidence—the complainant produced no documentary ownership proof, photos, or satisfactory explanation for alleged demolished debris, while a District Magistrate's report confirmed the houses under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana remained intact with family members residing there. The court accepted the final investigation report and concluded the officials' actions constituted lawful discharge of official duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case