MOHD JAVED SIDDIQUI vs VIRENDRA KUMAR VERMA (SINCE DECEASED) AND 3 OTHERS — SAPL/98/2026

Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Next hearing 29-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC010588632026

Filing Number

SAPL/

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

SAPL/98/2026

Registration Date

08-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SECOND APPEAL ( 300100 )

Sub-Category

MISC. ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Appeal

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD JAVED SIDDIQUI

    Adv. ANURAG SHRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIRENDRA KUMAR VERMA (SINCE DECEASED) AND 3 OTHERS

  2. 2.DEVENDRA VERMA

  3. 3.NEELAM VERMA

  4. 4.SAROJ DEVI (SINCE DECEASED)

Case History

  1. 29-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Piyush AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad admitted the second appeal filed by Mohd Javed Siddiqui against the lower court's order that had allowed the respondent's appeal and set aside the decree for permanent injunction. The court found arguable points of law and admitted the appeal on the substantial question of law, summoned the lower court record, and issued notice to respondents. The matter was listed for further hearing with interim relief to be considered at the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    —

    Piyush Agrawal

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    —

    Dr. Y. K. Srivastava

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Dr. Y. K. SrivastavaView PDF

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    —

    Dr. Y. K. Srivastava

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Dr. Y. K. SrivastavaView PDF

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    —

    Dr. Y. K. Srivastava

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Dr. Y. K. SrivastavaView PDF

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    Dr. Y. K. SrivastavaView PDF

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SAPL/98/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad admitted the second appeal filed by Mohd Javed Siddiqui against the lower court's order that had allowed the respondent's appeal and set aside the decree for permanent injunction. The court found arguable points of law and admitted the appeal on the substantial question of law, summoned the lower court record, and issued notice to respondents. The matter was listed for further hearing with interim relief to be considered at the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case