SMT PRIYANKA PRACHETA vs STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — NA529/411/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Disposed: -- on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010583572026

Filing Number

NA529/

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

NA529/411/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Judge

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Coram

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 401600 )

Sub-Category

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT PRIYANKA PRACHETA

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR,SURYA BHAN SINGH,SURYA BHAN SINGH, ,SURYA BHAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.INDAR

  3. 3.NEETU

  4. 4.MAHENDARA

  5. 5.SONU

  6. 6.MONU

  7. 7.SHUBHADRA

  8. 8.RAJ KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Shekhar Kumar Yadav

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the case (U/S 529 BNSS) to March 25, 2026, as service upon Opposite Party No. 8 was still pending. The applicant Smt. Priyanka Pracheta appeared in person as ordered, and the court directed both the applicant and Opposite Party No. 8 to appear in person on the next date for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Shekhar Kumar Yadav

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA529/411/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad adjourned the case (U/S 529 BNSS) to March 25, 2026, as service upon Opposite Party No. 8 was still pending. The applicant Smt. Priyanka Pracheta appeared in person as ordered, and the court directed both the applicant and Opposite Party No. 8 to appear in person on the next date for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case