JEETU vs State of UP 3 Others Advocate - G.A., ,HAYA RIZVI,HAYA RIZVI — BAIL/4871/2024
Disposed: -- on 27th November 2024.
CNR: UPHC010580172024
Filing Number
BAIL/21195/2024
Filing Date
31-Jan-2024
Registration No
BAIL/4871/2024
Registration Date
06-Feb-2024
Judge
Ajay Bhanot
Coram
Ajay Bhanot
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for bail (major) ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
27-Nov-2024
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JEETU
Adv. ANSAR AHMAD,SANDHYA CHATURVEDI,SANDHYA CHATURVEDI, ,SANDHYA CHATURVEDI,SANDHYA CHATURVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of UP 3 Others Advocate - G.A., ,HAYA RIZVI,HAYA RIZVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
19-Mar-2026
Ajay BhanotView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad rejected Jeetu's first bail application in a case involving sexual crimes against two minor street children under IPC Sections 363, 376D and POCSO Act Sections 5/6. The court directed the trial judge to submit a detailed report on trial status, witness examination progress, and delays, and ordered the Prosecution Joint Director to file an affidavit on witness details; the matter was adjourned for two weeks before a different bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
26-Feb-2026
Ajay BhanotView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
25-Feb-2026
Ajay BhanotView PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
—
Ajay Bhanot
-
18-Dec-2025
—
Vivek Varma
-
04-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. BAIL/4871/2024
The High Court of Allahabad rejected Jeetu's first bail application in a case involving sexual crimes against two minor street children under IPC Sections 363, 376D and POCSO Act Sections 5/6. The court directed the trial judge to submit a detailed report on trial status, witness examination progress, and delays, and ordered the Prosecution Joint Director to file an affidavit on witness details; the matter was adjourned for two weeks before a different bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts