BANTI THAKUR vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/4239/2026

Next hearing: 27th May 2026.

Next hearing 27-May-2026

CNR: UPHC010577952026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

NA528/4239/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of criminal Proceedings in State case ( 36 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANTI THAKUR

    Adv. RAMA SHANKER,RAY SAHAB YADAV,RAY SAHAB YADAV, ,RAY SAHAB YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.ANIL KUMAR JAIN

Case History

  1. 27-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-May-2026

    Chawan Prakash

  3. 20-May-2026

    Chawan Prakash

  4. 13-May-2026

    Chawan Prakash

  5. 06-May-2026

    Chawan Prakash

  6. 29-Apr-2026

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Sanjay Kumar PachoriView PDF

    Case Summary: In this Section 528 BNSS application, the High Court of Allahabad granted applicant Banti Thakur two weeks to file a supplementary affidavit with the case's Call Detail Record (C.D.R.). The case was adjourned to April 29, 2026 for fresh hearing, with no interim orders passed. The learned A.G.A. was directed to seek instructions by the next listing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Fresh

    Deepak Verma

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Sanjay Kumar Pachori

  12. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/4239/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this Section 528 BNSS application, the High Court of Allahabad granted applicant Banti Thakur two weeks to file a supplementary affidavit with the case's Call Detail Record (C.D.R.). The case was adjourned to April 29, 2026 for fresh hearing, with no interim orders passed. The learned A.G.A. was directed to seek instructions by the next listing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case