POORAN LAL MEENA AND 6 OTHERS vs UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - A.S.G.I., ,SHIV KUMAR PAL — WRIA/2096/2026

Disposed: -- on 12th February 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Feb-2026

CNR: UPHC010569792026

Filing Number

WRIA/

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

WRIA/2096/2026

Registration Date

08-Feb-2026

Judge

Arun Bhansali , Kshitij Shailendra

Coram

Arun Bhansali , Kshitij Shailendra

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO RAILWAY EMPLOYEES (DIVISION BENCH) ( 12600 )

Sub-Category

Service Tribunal s order ( 25 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Decision Date

12-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POORAN LAL MEENA AND 6 OTHERS

    Adv. VINOD KUMAR,SHYAM SUNDAR PAL,SHYAM SUNDAR PAL, ,SHYAM SUNDAR PAL

  2. 2.SITA RAM MEENA

    Adv. SHYAM SUNDAR PAL

  3. 3.DHARAM CHAND MEENA

    Adv. SHYAM SUNDAR PAL

  4. 4.PREETAM CHAND MEENA

    Adv. SHYAM SUNDAR PAL

  5. 5.ANIL MANDAL

    Adv. SHYAM SUNDAR PAL

  6. 6.SATYA NARAYAN MEENA

    Adv. SHYAM SUNDAR PAL

  7. 7.VISHRAM MEENA

    Adv. SHYAM SUNDAR PAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - A.S.G.I., ,SHIV KUMAR PAL

  2. 2.THE RAILWAY RECRUITMENT CELL THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY NORTH CENTRAL RAILWAYM BALMIKI CHAUHARA

    Adv. SHIV KUMAR PAL

  3. 3.THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER, RAILWAY RECRUITMENT CELL, NORTH CENTRAL RAILWAY BALMIKI CHA

    Adv. SHIV KUMAR PAL

  4. 4.THE ASSISTANT PERSONNEL OFFICER, NORTH CENTRAL RAILWAY BALMIKI CHAUHARA, NAWAB YUSUF ROAD, CIVIL LI

    Adv. SHIV KUMAR PAL

  5. 5.THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD 34 MG MARG CIVIL LINES

    Adv. SHIV KUMAR PAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    —

    Arun Bhansali , Kshitij Shailendra

  3. 12-Feb-2026

    Arun Bhansali,kshitij ShailendraView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad dismissed a writ petition by seven railway job applicants seeking Group-D appointments. The petitioners, who qualified for the 2007 recruitment notification but were on a 20% reserve list, claimed entitlement to fill vacancies created by non-joining candidates. The court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's dismissal, finding that petitioners' claims regarding 300 vacancies were baseless (only 44 existed) and their merit ranks fell significantly below category-wise cutoff thresholds, placing them outside the zone of consideration for appointment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIA/2096/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed a writ petition by seven railway job applicants seeking Group-D appointments. The petitioners, who qualified for the 2007 recruitment notification but were on a 20% reserve list, claimed entitlement to fill vacancies created by non-joining candidates. The court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's dismissal, finding that petitioners' claims regarding 300 vacancies were baseless (only 44 existed) and their merit ranks fell significantly below category-wise cutoff thresholds, placing them outside the zone of consideration for appointment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case