VINOD KUMAR AGRAHARI vs STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS — WRIC/3892/2026
Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010539852026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
WRIC/3892/2026
Registration Date
29-Jan-2026
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISCELLANEOUS RECOVERY ( 39900 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINOD KUMAR AGRAHARI
Adv. SHRI KANT SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS
Adv. ,C.S.C. 1123
-
2.REGIONAL FOOD CONTROLLER BASTI REGION
Adv. C.S.C.
-
3.DISTRICT FOOD MARKETING OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
-
4.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
-
5.TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL ITWA
Adv. C.S.C.
-
6.AJAY KUMAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
7.RAM KUMAR
Adv. C.S.C.
-
8.SHYAM KUMAR AGRAHARI
Adv. C.S.C.
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
—
Indrajeet Shukla , Ajit Kumar
-
21-May-2026
—
Indrajeet Shukla , Ajit Kumar
-
14-May-2026
—
Indrajeet Shukla , Ajit Kumar
-
07-May-2026
—
Indrajeet Shukla , Ajit Kumar
-
30-Apr-2026
—
Indrajeet Shukla , Ajit Kumar
-
23-Apr-2026
—
Indrajeet Shukla , Ajit Kumar
-
16-Apr-2026
—
Swarupama Chaturvedi , Ajit Kumar
-
08-Apr-2026
—
Swarupama Chaturvedi , Ajit Kumar
-
17-Mar-2026
Swarupama Chaturvedi,ajit KumarView PDF
The High Court at Allahabad granted interim relief to petitioner Vinod Kumar Agrahari by staying recovery proceedings against him pending submission of a report from the Tehsildar. The Court directed that recovery cannot be pursued without its permission, though respondents may continue recovery against Shyam Kumar. The case was adjourned to April 8, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
—
Swarupama Chaturvedi , Ajit Kumar
-
24-Feb-2026
Swarupama Chaturvedi,ajit KumarView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Swarupama Chaturvedi,ajit KumarView PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/3892/2026
The High Court at Allahabad granted interim relief to petitioner Vinod Kumar Agrahari by staying recovery proceedings against him pending submission of a report from the Tehsildar. The Court directed that recovery cannot be pursued without its permission, though respondents may continue recovery against Shyam Kumar. The case was adjourned to April 8, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts