SHANTI vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,VIJAY PRAKASH CHATURVEDI — NA529/388/2026
Case under Advocates Act Section 125,10-125. Disposed: -- on 30th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010532722026
Filing Number
NA529/
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
NA529/388/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Judge
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Coram
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 401600 )
Sub-Category
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION U/S 483 Cr.P.C. ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 08-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANTI
Adv. MOHAMMAD ZAFAR YAB KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,VIJAY PRAKASH CHATURVEDI
-
2.RAM BANARAS
Adv. VIJAY PRAKASH CHATURVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
23-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
16-Mar-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
09-Mar-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
23-Feb-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
The Allahabad High Court in application NA529/388/2026 adjourned the case after the applicant's counsel indicated fair possibility of settlement between parties through mediation. The court issued notice to the private opposite party and directed both parties to appear in person on 16.02.2026, with the AGA instructed to communicate the order through the concerned police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA529/388/2026
The Allahabad High Court in application NA529/388/2026 adjourned the case after the applicant's counsel indicated fair possibility of settlement between parties through mediation. The court issued notice to the private opposite party and directed both parties to appear in person on 16.02.2026, with the AGA instructed to communicate the order through the concerned police station. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts