RAM KISHAN ALIAS KISHAN RAJ KUMAR SHUKLA, SMT.SARITA SHUKLA vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS — WRIA/48713/2015
Disposed: -- on 19th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010490652015
Filing Number
WRIA/48713/2015
Filing Date
26-Aug-2015
Registration No
WRIA/48713/2015
Registration Date
26-Aug-2015
Judge
Anish Kumar Gupta
Coram
Anish Kumar Gupta
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (SINGLE BENCH) ( 11500 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAM KISHAN ALIAS KISHAN RAJ KUMAR SHUKLA, SMT.SARITA SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Anish Kumar GuptaView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Writ Petition No. 48713/2015 as abated on March 19, 2026, after the petitioner Ram Kishan Alias Kishan Raj Kumar Shukla died during the proceedings. Since the sole petitioner's death rendered the petition infructuous (incapable of producing any useful result), the court found it appropriate to dismiss the case rather than continue with proceedings that could no longer benefit the deceased petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
23-Feb-2026
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
15-Nov-2025
—
Vikas Budhwar
-
11-Aug-2025
—
Prakash Padia
-
22-Jan-2025
—
Prakash Padia
-
27-Nov-2024
—
Prakash Padia
-
06-Nov-2024
For Order
Prakash Padia
-
03-Oct-2024
—
Prakash Padia
-
16-Jan-2024
For Final Disposal
Prakash Padia
-
12-Jan-2024
For Admission
J.J. Munir
-
28-Aug-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Aug-2015
Case filed
Registration No. WRIA/48713/2015
The High Court of Allahabad dismissed Writ Petition No. 48713/2015 as abated on March 19, 2026, after the petitioner Ram Kishan Alias Kishan Raj Kumar Shukla died during the proceedings. Since the sole petitioner's death rendered the petition infructuous (incapable of producing any useful result), the court found it appropriate to dismiss the case rather than continue with proceedings that could no longer benefit the deceased petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts