GYAN PRAKASH vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., PIYUSH DUBEY — NA528/5753/2026

Case under Civil Defence Act Section 138,216-138. Disposed: -- on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Feb-2026

CNR: UPHC010485652026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

NA528/5753/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Judge

Deepak Verma

Coram

Deepak Verma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/S 482 Cr.P.C. against order of Magistrate under section 138 of negotiable instruments Act 1881 ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Defence Act Section 138,216-138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GYAN PRAKASH

    Adv. DHANANJAY KUMAR MISHRA,ARVIND KUMAR GOSWAMI,ARVIND KUMAR GOSWAMI, ,ARVIND KUMAR GOSWAMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., PIYUSH DUBEY

  2. 2.SMT. SANJU SINGH

    Adv. PIYUSH DUBEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    As Fresh

    Deepak Verma

  3. 18-Feb-2026

    Deepak VermaView PDF

    This is an interlocutory order from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated February 18, 2026. The court accepted the vakalatnama (power of attorney) filed by advocate Piyush Dubey on behalf of opposite party no. 2, and adjourned the case by two weeks for fresh hearing with Piyush Dubey noted as counsel for opposite party 2. No substantive decision on the merits was rendered in this preliminary procedural order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/5753/2026

casestatus.in Summary

This is an interlocutory order from the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated February 18, 2026. The court accepted the vakalatnama (power of attorney) filed by advocate Piyush Dubey on behalf of opposite party no. 2, and adjourned the case by two weeks for fresh hearing with Piyush Dubey noted as counsel for opposite party 2. No substantive decision on the merits was rendered in this preliminary procedural order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case