SANT GUPTA @ SANT KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/3633/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Next hearing 12-May-2026

CNR: UPHC010482702026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

NA528/3633/2026

Registration Date

24-Jan-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

U/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet ( 27 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 506,43-506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANT GUPTA @ SANT KUMAR GUPTA

    Adv. PEEYUSH KUMAR,RAM CHANDRA,RAM CHANDRA, ,RAM CHANDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.SMT. SUNITA DEVI

Case History

  1. 12-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-May-2026

    Chawan Prakash

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Avnish Saxena

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    For Order

    Padam Narain Mishra

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Padam Narain MishraView PDF

    Case Summary: NA528/3633/2026 Sant Gupta filed a Section 528 BNSS petition to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2003 of 2021) under IPC Sections 406 and 506, alleging the FIR was based on false and frivolous charges intended to harass him regarding property related to a deceased person. The court found the matter prima facie requires consideration and issued notice to the complainant. The case was adjourned for six weeks with counter-affidavits due within four weeks, and a stay on coercive action against the applicant was granted pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Padam Narain Mishra

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/3633/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: NA528/3633/2026 Sant Gupta filed a Section 528 BNSS petition to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2003 of 2021) under IPC Sections 406 and 506, alleging the FIR was based on false and frivolous charges intended to harass him regarding property related to a deceased person. The court found the matter prima facie requires consideration and issued notice to the complainant. The case was adjourned for six weeks with counter-affidavits due within four weeks, and a stay on coercive action against the applicant was granted pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case