NITESH PANDEY vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH — CRLA/991/2026
Case under Actquaries Act Section 3(1)(dha),72-3(1)(dha). Disposed: -- on 26th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010466382026
Filing Number
CRLA/
Filing Date
22-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRLA/991/2026
Registration Date
24-Jan-2026
Judge
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Coram
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Appeal under provision of of 14 (A) (2) of SC/ST against Bail orders allowing or rejecting the bail applications by the SC /ST Special Court ( Exclusive Special Courts) (Minor Bail category) ( 17 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NITESH PANDEY
Adv. HARE RAM PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
-
2.RAJ KUMAR PRASAD
Adv. BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
27-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
26-Mar-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
Summary of CRLA No. 991 of 2026 The Allahabad High Court allowed Nitesh Pandey's appeal and set aside the trial court's bail rejection order dated 18.12.2025. The court found that Pandey established a case for bail based on weak evidence, including a seven-month delay in lodging the FIR (21.3.2020 to 19.10.2020), admission that the visa was genuine, absence of medical evidence or independent witnesses, and Pandey's clean criminal history. Pandey was granted bail on personal bond with two sureties, subject to standard conditions including non-tampering with evidence and witness non-intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
12-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
26-Feb-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/991/2026
Summary of CRLA No. 991 of 2026 The Allahabad High Court allowed Nitesh Pandey's appeal and set aside the trial court's bail rejection order dated 18.12.2025. The court found that Pandey established a case for bail based on weak evidence, including a seven-month delay in lodging the FIR (21.3.2020 to 19.10.2020), admission that the visa was genuine, absence of medical evidence or independent witnesses, and Pandey's clean criminal history. Pandey was granted bail on personal bond with two sureties, subject to standard conditions including non-tampering with evidence and witness non-intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts