SUNITA DEVI vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,BRIJ BHUSHAN PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA — CRLA/2925/2026
Case under Advocates Act Section 156(3),10-156(3). Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010448192026
Filing Number
CRLA/
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRLA/2925/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Appeal u/s 14A(1) against any order (Including orders of cancellation of bail), not being an interlocutory order, passed by Exclusive Special Court or Special Court of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities ) Amendment Act, 20 ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNITA DEVI
Adv. RAM PRASAD YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS Advocate - G.A., ,BRIJ BHUSHAN PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA
-
2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER
Adv. BRIJ BHUSHAN PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA
-
3.MANOJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Adv. BRIJ BHUSHAN PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
20-May-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
13-May-2026
—
Vani Ranjan Agrawal
-
06-May-2026
—
Tej Pratap Tiwari
-
29-Apr-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
15-Apr-2026
—
Madan Pal Singh
-
03-Apr-2026
—
Abdul Shahid
-
28-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2026
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
In Criminal Appeal No. 2925 of 2026, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad issued notices to opposite parties 2 and 3 through the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate and Investigating Officer. The case was adjourned for fresh hearing on 7.4.2026, with the court clarifying that issuance of notice does not constitute a stay of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/2925/2026
In Criminal Appeal No. 2925 of 2026, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad issued notices to opposite parties 2 and 3 through the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate and Investigating Officer. The case was adjourned for fresh hearing on 7.4.2026, with the court clarifying that issuance of notice does not constitute a stay of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts