RAVI SAINI vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,ARCHANA SINGH,SAURABH PRATAP SINGH — CRLA/1043/2026
Case under Andhra State Act Section 323,43-323. Disposed: -- on 13th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC010438442026
Filing Number
CRLA/
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRLA/1043/2026
Registration Date
27-Jan-2026
Judge
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Coram
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )
Sub-Category
Appeal under provision of of 14 (A) (2) of SC/ST against Bail orders allowing or rejecting the bail applications by the SC /ST Special Court ( Exclusive Special Courts) (major Bail category) ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Crl. Appeals
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVI SAINI
Adv. APSARA,SATYA PRAKASH RAI,SATYA PRAKASH RAI, ,SATYA PRAKASH RAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,ARCHANA SINGH,SAURABH PRATAP SINGH
-
2.EKTA RANI
Adv. SAURABH PRATAP SINGH ARCHANA SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
27-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
26-Mar-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
This is a preliminary order in Criminal Appeal No. 1043 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The court directed that the case be listed for fresh hearing on 13.4.2026 and instructed the learned Additional Government Advocate (A.G.A.) to file a counter affidavit in the interim. No substantive decision on the appeal merits has been rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
12-Mar-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
26-Feb-2026
—
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Shekhar Kumar YadavView PDF
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLA/1043/2026
This is a preliminary order in Criminal Appeal No. 1043 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The court directed that the case be listed for fresh hearing on 13.4.2026 and instructed the learned Additional Government Advocate (A.G.A.) to file a counter affidavit in the interim. No substantive decision on the appeal merits has been rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts