SMT. FIZA AND 4 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — CRLP/2039/2026
Next hearing: 01st May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010437132026
Filing Number
CRLP/
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRLP/2039/2026
Registration Date
27-Jan-2026
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
QUASHING OF FIR ( 150300 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal WRITS
Last updated 03-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. FIZA AND 4 OTHERS
Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR YADAV
-
2.RIHAN SIDDIQUI
-
3.ATIF
-
4.SAGEER
-
5.SAMEER
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
-
3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SOUTH
-
4.MEHRUNISHA
Case History
-
01-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
01-May-2026
—
Lakshmi Kant Shukla , J.J. Munir
-
24-Apr-2026
—
Achal Sachdev , Rajiv Gupta
-
20-Feb-2026
Achal Sachdev,rajiv GuptaView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP 2039/2026 The case was adjourned for further consideration. The Allahabad High Court issued notice to respondent no. 4 (returnable within four weeks) and directed the State to file a counter affidavit. Importantly, the court granted protection from arrest to the petitioners until the next hearing on 24.04.2026. The petitioners challenged an FIR alleging abduction and forced marriage, claiming the 22-year-old woman married voluntarily and is living peacefully with her husband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Feb-2026
—
Achal Sachdev , Rajiv Gupta
-
13-Feb-2026
—
Achal Sachdev , Rajiv Gupta
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/2039/2026
Case Summary: CRLP 2039/2026 The case was adjourned for further consideration. The Allahabad High Court issued notice to respondent no. 4 (returnable within four weeks) and directed the State to file a counter affidavit. Importantly, the court granted protection from arrest to the petitioners until the next hearing on 24.04.2026. The petitioners challenged an FIR alleging abduction and forced marriage, claiming the 22-year-old woman married voluntarily and is living peacefully with her husband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts