AVDHESH CHAUHAN vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,ASHUTOSH,PAVAN KUMAR — CRLR/697/2026

Case under Andhra State Act Section 411,43-411. Disposed: -- on 19th February 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010405712026

Filing Number

CRLR/

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRLR/697/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Judge

Abdul Shahid

Coram

Abdul Shahid

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISION ( 401300 )

Sub-Category

Against order issuing summons in case of any nature not provided elsewhere ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

19-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Andhra State Act Section 411,43-411

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AVDHESH CHAUHAN

    Adv. RAJ KUMAR SINGH,SUNIL KUMAR SINGH,SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, ,SUNIL KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A., ,ASHUTOSH,PAVAN KUMAR

  2. 2.CHANDRABHAN CHAUHAN

    Adv. PAVAN KUMAR ASHUTOSH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Feb-2026

    —

    Abdul Shahid

  3. 19-Feb-2026

    Abdul ShahidView PDF

    The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed Avdhesh Chauhan's revision petition challenging his summoning as an accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. in a murder case. The court found sufficient evidence on record—including eyewitness depositions identifying Chauhan as the person who fired the fatal shot—to satisfy the threshold for summoning an additional accused, and held that witness credibility is a matter for trial, not revision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    —

    Abdul Shahid

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLR/697/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed Avdhesh Chauhan's revision petition challenging his summoning as an accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. in a murder case. The court found sufficient evidence on record—including eyewitness depositions identifying Chauhan as the person who fired the fatal shot—to satisfy the threshold for summoning an additional accused, and held that witness credibility is a matter for trial, not revision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case