SHYAMVEER SINGH AND 5 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - AVINASH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA — WRIC/3699/2026
Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC010397172026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
WRIC/3699/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Writs relating to Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code 2006 and Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules 2016 ( 110400 )
Sub-Category
( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHYAMVEER SINGH AND 5 OTHERS
Adv. RABINDRA BAHADUR SINGH
-
2.DHARMAVEER SINGH
-
3.SMT. PUSHPA DEVI
-
4.SMT. KIRAN DEVI
-
5.PIYUS KUMAR
-
6.AYAS KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS Advocate - AVINASH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA
-
2.COMMISSIONER AGRA MANDAL
-
3.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
-
4.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE SHIKOHABAD
-
5.GAON SABHA/BHUMI PRABANDHAK SAMITI VILLAGE JARAULI, TEHSIL JASRANA
-
6.SONVEER
-
7.JAYVEER
Case History
-
15-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
—
Manish Kumar Nigam
-
07-Apr-2026
—
Manish Kumar Nigam
-
23-Mar-2026
Manish Kumar NigamView PDF
Case Summary: WRIC/3699/2026 In this writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the petitioners (Shyamveer Singh and 5 others) sought relief against the State of U.P. and 6 others. On March 23, 2026, the court granted an adjournment as requested by the petitioner's counsel and adjourned the matter for two weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
—
Prakash Padia
-
16-Mar-2026
—
Prakash Padia
-
09-Mar-2026
—
Prakash Padia
-
23-Feb-2026
—
Manju Rani Chauhan
-
16-Feb-2026
Fresh
Prakash Padia
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/3699/2026
Case Summary: WRIC/3699/2026 In this writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the petitioners (Shyamveer Singh and 5 others) sought relief against the State of U.P. and 6 others. On March 23, 2026, the court granted an adjournment as requested by the petitioner's counsel and adjourned the matter for two weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts