VIRENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL AND 2 OTHERS vs EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION (EPFO) AND 2 OTHERS — WRIC/2706/2026
Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
CNR: UPHC010395262026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
WRIC/2706/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT 1952 ( 21900 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 08-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIRENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. DIPTIMAN SINGH,ABHIJIT CHATTERJI,ABHIJIT CHATTERJI, ,ABHIJIT CHATTERJI
-
2.NITIN GOEL
Adv. ABHIJIT CHATTERJI
-
3.VISHAL GOEL
Adv. ABHIJIT CHATTERJI
Respondent(s)
-
1.EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION (EPFO) AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. ,MOHD. SALEEM KHAN,YOGESH KUMAR TRIPATHI 1123
-
2.RECOVERY OFFICER. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNG ORGANIZATION (EPFO)
Adv. YOGESH KUMAR TRIPATHI MOHD. SALEEM KHAN
-
3.UTTAR PRADESH FINANCIAL CORPORATION (UPFC)
Adv. YOGESH KUMAR TRIPATHI MOHD. SALEEM KHAN
Case History
-
30-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Mar-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
23-Mar-2026
—
Arun Kumar
-
04-Feb-2026
Arun KumarView PDF
Case Summary: WRIC 2706/2026 The Allahabad High Court found that EPFO's recovery of Rs. 3,01,697 in outstanding provident fund contributions (1970-1979) from petitioner Virendra Kumar Agarwal was illegal and unjustified. The court held that since the petitioner inherited no assets from the closed company (M/s R.R. Steel and Alloys), liability under Section 17B cannot be transferred to him. The recovery order dated 14.11.2025 was kept in abeyance; respondents were granted four weeks to file counter-affidavits, with the matter listed for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/2706/2026
Case Summary: WRIC 2706/2026 The Allahabad High Court found that EPFO's recovery of Rs. 3,01,697 in outstanding provident fund contributions (1970-1979) from petitioner Virendra Kumar Agarwal was illegal and unjustified. The court held that since the petitioner inherited no assets from the closed company (M/s R.R. Steel and Alloys), liability under Section 17B cannot be transferred to him. The recovery order dated 14.11.2025 was kept in abeyance; respondents were granted four weeks to file counter-affidavits, with the matter listed for further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts