KM. SAVITA (MINOR) TROUGH HER NATURAL GUARDIAN / FATHER DURGA PRASAD vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - G.A. — HABC/67/2026
Disposed: -- on 09th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC010392532026
Filing Number
HABC/
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
HABC/67/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Judge
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
Coram
Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar (Judicial)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SINGLE JUDGE ( 160100 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal WRITS
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KM. SAVITA (MINOR) TROUGH HER NATURAL GUARDIAN / FATHER DURGA PRASAD
Adv. RAKESH KUMAR MISHRA,SUMIT KUMAR GUPTA,SUMIT KUMAR GUPTA, ,PRIYANKA SINGH,SUMIT KUMAR GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, P.S. ATARRA
-
3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S. ATARRA
-
4.AMIT SHRIVAS
-
5.RAJ BAHADUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
—
Harvir Singh
-
18-Mar-2026
Harvir SinghView PDF
The Allahabad High Court heard a habeas corpus petition where the petitioner's minor daughter was allegedly enticed away by respondents. The court found the police investigation grossly inadequate—instructions contained basic errors (confusing daughter with wife), showed multiple investigator transfers without clarity, and revealed only preliminary steps like seeking phone numbers with no substantive progress. The court directed the Superintendent of Police, Banda, to file a detailed affidavit explaining the investigation failures and why the minor could not be traced, with the case listed for April 9, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
11-Mar-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
13-Feb-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
10-Feb-2026
Vinod DiwakarView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2026
Vinod DiwakarView PDF
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. HABC/67/2026
The Allahabad High Court heard a habeas corpus petition where the petitioner's minor daughter was allegedly enticed away by respondents. The court found the police investigation grossly inadequate—instructions contained basic errors (confusing daughter with wife), showed multiple investigator transfers without clarity, and revealed only preliminary steps like seeking phone numbers with no substantive progress. The court directed the Superintendent of Police, Banda, to file a detailed affidavit explaining the investigation failures and why the minor could not be traced, with the case listed for April 9, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts