VRS FOODS LIMITED vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A. — NA528/8344/2026

Disposed: -- on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UPHC010389952026

Filing Number

NA528/

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

NA528/8344/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Judge

Vivek Kumar Singh

Coram

Vivek Kumar Singh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATION ( 401500 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous under the Head of Crl. Misc. Applications ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Misc.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VRS FOODS LIMITED

    Adv. ANAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,SAMIR SRIVASTAVA,SAMIR SRIVASTAVA, ,SAMIR SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.FOOD SAFETY OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Vivek Kumar SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad dismissed VRS Foods Limited's application challenging an order dated 07.11.2025 passed by the Additional District Magistrate under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The court held the application unmaintainable as an alternative statutory remedy existed under Section 70 of the Act, allowing appeal before the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal. The application was dismissed "not pressed" with liberty to file the proper appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    —

    Vivek Kumar Singh

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. NA528/8344/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad dismissed VRS Foods Limited's application challenging an order dated 07.11.2025 passed by the Additional District Magistrate under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The court held the application unmaintainable as an alternative statutory remedy existed under Section 70 of the Act, allowing appeal before the Food Safety Appellate Tribunal. The application was dismissed "not pressed" with liberty to file the proper appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case