SURYA NARAYAN AND OTHERS PULAK GANGULY, SUDHANSHU PANDEY,ANUP DHAR DUBEY vs STATE OF U.P. — CRLA/5765/2010

Next hearing: 27th May 2026.

Next hearing 27-May-2026

CNR: UPHC010376622010

Filing Number

CRLA/5765/2010

Filing Date

28-Aug-2010

Registration No

CRLA/5765/2010

Registration Date

28-Aug-2010

Judge

Ravindra Singh

Coram

Ravindra Singh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter where offence U/s 304B I.P.C. is involved (SB) ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURYA NARAYAN AND OTHERS PULAK GANGULY, SUDHANSHU PANDEY,ANUP DHAR DUBEY

  2. 2.SRI NARAYAN MAURYA @ CHOTTEY LAL S/O RAM KISHORE MAURYA

    Adv. ANUP DHAR DUBEY SUDHANSHU PANDEY

  3. 3.RAM KISHORE MAURYA S/O LATE RAMESHWAR MAURYA

    Adv. ANUP DHAR DUBEY SUDHANSHU PANDEY

  4. 4.SMT. BASANTA DEVI W/O RAM KISHORE MAURYA

    Adv. ANUP DHAR DUBEY SUDHANSHU PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

Case History

  1. 27-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-May-2026

    —

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  3. 20-May-2026

    —

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad adjourned Criminal Appeal No. 5765/2010 for four weeks as service of notice on the appellants remained pending. The court directed the State's Advocate General to obtain a custody certificate of the appellant from the concerned Jail Authority in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    —

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF

  7. 01-Nov-2015

    —

    No Tied Up

  8. 30-Aug-2010

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 28-Aug-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/5765/2010

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad adjourned Criminal Appeal No. 5765/2010 for four weeks as service of notice on the appellants remained pending. The court directed the State's Advocate General to obtain a custody certificate of the appellant from the concerned Jail Authority in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case