ASIF AALAM SIDDIQI vs SMT ANAM HASHMI — FAPL/88/2026

Disposed: -- on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Feb-2026

CNR: UPHC010351912026

Filing Number

FAPL/

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

FAPL/88/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Judge

Satya Veer Singh , Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar (J) (Cpc)

Coram

Satya Veer Singh , Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar (J) (Cpc)

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 301100 )

Sub-Category

Other matters u/s 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Appeal

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASIF AALAM SIDDIQI

    Adv. AVINASH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT ANAM HASHMI

    Adv. MEHDI ABBAS 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    —

    Satya Veer Singh , Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar (J) (Cpc)

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    Satya Veer Singh,saurabh Dwivedi Registrar (J) (Cpc)View PDF

    Case Summary: FAPL/88/2026 The High Court of Allahabad admitted Asif Aalam Siddiqi's appeal against a Family Court custody order dated 26 August 2022 that awarded custody of his son to respondent Smt Anam Hashmi. The appellant claimed lack of notice and sought to set aside the ex-parte judgment, but the Family Court rejected this application on 2 January 2026. The High Court rejected the appellant's interim stay request, noting the respondent's two successive victories in Family Court and ongoing execution proceedings, and adjourned the matter to 17 March 2026 for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAPL/88/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAPL/88/2026 The High Court of Allahabad admitted Asif Aalam Siddiqi's appeal against a Family Court custody order dated 26 August 2022 that awarded custody of his son to respondent Smt Anam Hashmi. The appellant claimed lack of notice and sought to set aside the ex-parte judgment, but the Family Court rejected this application on 2 January 2026. The High Court rejected the appellant's interim stay request, noting the respondent's two successive victories in Family Court and ongoing execution proceedings, and adjourned the matter to 17 March 2026 for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case