ABHISHEK KASANA AND 4 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER — NA528/2612/2026
Disposed: -- on 15th April 2026.
CNR: UPHC010351712026
Filing Number
NA528/
Filing Date
17-Jan-2026
Registration No
NA528/2612/2026
Registration Date
19-Jan-2026
Judge
Deepak Verma
Coram
Deepak Verma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATION ( 401500 )
Sub-Category
Criminal Misc. Application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. in the matter of Domestic Violence Act ( 49 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Misc.
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--
Last updated 27-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABHISHEK KASANA AND 4 OTHERS
Adv. VIPUL KUMAR SINGH
-
2.SUBHASH @ PAPPU
-
3.SMT. SANTOSH
-
4.SAKSHI
-
5.SUNNY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
Adv. CHANDRA BIR SINGH,G.A. 1123
-
2.SMT. VARSHA
Adv. G.A. CHANDRA BIR SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
As Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
24-Mar-2026
Deepak VermaView PDF
The High Court of Allahabad, in an interlocutory order dated March 24, 2026, admitted the vakalatnama (power of attorney) of advocate Chandra Bir Singh for the applicants and adjourned the case for three weeks at the applicants' request. No substantive decision was rendered; the matter was merely listed for further hearing with fresh representation by the named counsel for opposite party no. 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
As Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
23-Feb-2026
Deepak VermaView PDF
-
23-Feb-2026
Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
16-Feb-2026
Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
09-Feb-2026
Fresh
Deepak Verma
-
02-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. NA528/2612/2026
The High Court of Allahabad, in an interlocutory order dated March 24, 2026, admitted the vakalatnama (power of attorney) of advocate Chandra Bir Singh for the applicants and adjourned the case for three weeks at the applicants' request. No substantive decision was rendered; the matter was merely listed for further hearing with fresh representation by the named counsel for opposite party no. 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts