HARI SHANKAR PANDEY, HEAD CONSTABLE vs THE STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C. — WRIA/1982/2026

Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Next hearing 24-Apr-2026

CNR: UPHC010324702026

Filing Number

WRIA/

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

WRIA/1982/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (SINGLE BENCH) ( 11500 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 90 )

Judicial Branch

Civil WRITS

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARI SHANKAR PANDEY, HEAD CONSTABLE

    Adv. ATIPRIYA GAUTAM,ARYA GAUTAM,ARYA GAUTAM, ,Sr. Advocate,PRATYUSH SRIVASTAVA,ARYA GAUTAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

  3. 3.THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

  4. 4.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

  5. 5.THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  6. 6.THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Prakash Padia

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Vikas BudhwarView PDF

    In WRIT-A No. 1982 of 2026 before the High Court of Allahabad, the case of Hari Shankar Pandey (Head Constable) against the State of U.P. and 5 others was adjourned. The State was granted six weeks to file a counter affidavit, with the petitioner permitted to file a rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter. The matter was listed for subsequent hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WRIA/1982/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In WRIT-A No. 1982 of 2026 before the High Court of Allahabad, the case of Hari Shankar Pandey (Head Constable) against the State of U.P. and 5 others was adjourned. The State was granted six weeks to file a counter affidavit, with the petitioner permitted to file a rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter. The matter was listed for subsequent hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case