RADHEY SHYAM AND ANOTHER S.N. SINGH, JAGDISH PRASAD MISHRA,RAKESH YADAV,J.P. MISHRA vs STATE OF U.P. — CRLA/879/2006

Disposed: -- on 10th February 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Feb-2006

CNR: UPHC010324412006

Filing Number

CRLA/879/2006

Filing Date

20-Feb-2006

Registration No

CRLA/879/2006

Registration Date

20-Feb-2006

Judge

Vani Ranjan Agrawal

Coram

Vani Ranjan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 400700 )

Sub-Category

Judgment in the matter relating to any other office mentioned in Indian Penal Code not covered in above categories. ( 85 )

Judicial Branch

Crl. Appeals

Decision Date

10-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

--

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RADHEY SHYAM AND ANOTHER S.N. SINGH, JAGDISH PRASAD MISHRA,RAKESH YADAV,J.P. MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P.

    Adv. RAKESH YADAV,SHRAWAN KUMAR TRIPATHI 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Feb-2026

    Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF

    The High Court of Allahabad affirmed the conviction of appellant Radhey Shyam under IPC Sections 308/34 and 323/34 for assaulting complainant's family members during a land dispute in 1999, but set aside the sentence of four years imprisonment. Instead, the court released him on probation of good conduct for one year, requiring two sureties of Rs.20,000 each, considering he was a first-time offender with no criminal history and had endured prolonged trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    —

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    —

    Vani Ranjan Agrawal

  5. 06-Jan-2026

    Vani Ranjan AgrawalView PDF

  6. 12-Sep-2025

    —

    Manoj Bajaj

  7. 22-Feb-2006

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Feb-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/879/2006

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Allahabad affirmed the conviction of appellant Radhey Shyam under IPC Sections 308/34 and 323/34 for assaulting complainant's family members during a land dispute in 1999, but set aside the sentence of four years imprisonment. Instead, the court released him on probation of good conduct for one year, requiring two sureties of Rs.20,000 each, considering he was a first-time offender with no criminal history and had endured prolonged trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case