RAMKUMAR vs PASCHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND 3 OTHERS — WRIC/2449/2026
Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CNR: UPHC010317602026
Filing Number
WRIC/
Filing Date
16-Jan-2026
Registration No
WRIC/2449/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WRIT PETITIONS (EXCEPT ORDERS OF CIVIL COURT AND TAX MATTERS) ( 181000 )
Sub-Category
ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE AUTHORITY ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil WRITS
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMKUMAR
Adv. KRISHNA DUTT TIWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.PASCHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. ,KARTIKEYA SARAN 1123
-
2.ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN U.P. AT LUCKNOW VIBHUTI KHAND
Adv. KARTIKEYA SARAN
-
3.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VIDYUT VITRAM KHAND PRATHAM TOWN HALL
Adv. KARTIKEYA SARAN
-
4.VIJAY KUMAR
Adv. KARTIKEYA SARAN
Case History
-
27-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
20-May-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
13-May-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
06-May-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
29-Apr-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
22-Apr-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
15-Apr-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
07-Apr-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
31-Mar-2026
—
Vinod Diwakar
-
24-Mar-2026
—
Anish Kumar Gupta
-
17-Mar-2026
—
Arun Kumar
-
10-Mar-2026
—
Arun Kumar
-
03-Feb-2026
Arun KumarView PDF
In WRIC No. 2449/2026 at Allahabad High Court, petitioner Ramkumar's writ petition against Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited and others was adjourned on February 3, 2026. The case was passed over for the day at the request of the petitioner's counsel, with the matter listed for fresh hearing after four weeks. No substantive order on merits was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WRIC/2449/2026
In WRIC No. 2449/2026 at Allahabad High Court, petitioner Ramkumar's writ petition against Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited and others was adjourned on February 3, 2026. The case was passed over for the day at the request of the petitioner's counsel, with the matter listed for fresh hearing after four weeks. No substantive order on merits was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts