AKSHAY KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS — CRLP/1220/2026
Next hearing: 24th February 2026.
CNR: UPHC010262182026
Filing Number
CRLP/
Filing Date
14-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRLP/1220/2026
Registration Date
17-Jan-2026
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
QUASHING OF FIR ( 150300 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 90 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal WRITS
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AKSHAY KUMAR AND 5 OTHERS
Adv. SUNIL CHOUDHARY,VIPIN KUMAR,VIPIN KUMAR, ,VIPIN CHIKARA
-
2.VIMLESH DEVI
Adv. VIPIN KUMAR
-
3.SHIVANI KUMARI
Adv. VIPIN KUMAR
-
4.KOMAL RAWAT
Adv. VIPIN KUMAR
-
5.KAMLESH
Adv. VIPIN KUMAR
-
6.SHIVAM MALIK
Adv. VIPIN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
Adv. ,ASHUTOSH UPADHYAY,G.A. 1123
-
2.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Adv. G.A. ASHUTOSH UPADHYAY
-
3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION MAHILA THANA
Adv. G.A. ASHUTOSH UPADHYAY
-
4.SAUMYA CHOUDHARY
Adv. G.A. ASHUTOSH UPADHYAY
Case History
-
24-Feb-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Mar-2026
—
Tarun Saxena , Ajay Bhanot
-
13-Feb-2026
Tarun Saxena,ajay BhanotView PDF
Summary of CRLP No. 1220/2026 The Allahabad High Court allowed the amendment application and granted interim relief in this writ petition challenging an FIR registered under BNS Sections 64, 89, 351(2), 351(3). The petitioners' arrest is stayed until the next hearing or police report filing, whichever is earlier. The court found the matter requires consideration on whether the FIR was motivated by malice in a consensual relationship dispute, and directed respondents to file counter-affidavits within four weeks with the case relisted thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2026
—
Tarun Saxena , Ajay Bhanot
-
06-Feb-2026
—
Tarun Saxena , Ajay Bhanot
-
30-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/1220/2026
Summary of CRLP No. 1220/2026 The Allahabad High Court allowed the amendment application and granted interim relief in this writ petition challenging an FIR registered under BNS Sections 64, 89, 351(2), 351(3). The petitioners' arrest is stayed until the next hearing or police report filing, whichever is earlier. The court found the matter requires consideration on whether the FIR was motivated by malice in a consensual relationship dispute, and directed respondents to file counter-affidavits within four weeks with the case relisted thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts